Bulls vs. Blazers 11/17
Bulls vs. Blazers
11/17/21
Chicago's Achilles Heel, DeRozan DeRailed, The Coach's Challenge, and More!
Three Thoughts From Today's Game
1. The Bulls Have An Achilles Heel -- For Now
No, I'm not even going to talk about size and rebounding. It's about how successful teams have been when they turn to a zone defense or throw hard doubles at either DeRozan or Lavine when the other is on the bench. The strategy seems particularly effective against Lavine as he is looser with the ball and lacks the decision-making that DeRozan typically shows. Lavine got doubled relentlessly in the 3rd quarter, and since the role players can't initiate the action, and most cannot reliably knock down a 3-point shot either (Caruso passed up a lot of take-able 3s tonight), it's a strategy that's working for teams, and the Bulls are going to see more of it. Vucevic will hopefully counter this strategy when he comes back. Otherwise, the Bulls will have problems.
2. DeRozan DeRailed
Yes, DeRozan is DeMarvelous but he also just DeHuman. DeRozan was on fire in the first half, but he went ice cold in the second half, although it was also due to the Blazers contesting almost every one of his shots. He made uncharacteristically bad choices down the stretch as well that led to turnovers or shots that were as good as turnovers while perhaps forcing the action in isolation plays too much and too often. Though his aggressive plays also helped him get to the line and keep the Bulls in the game as well. Regardless, the Bulls' need for either a creator to break down defenses, a deadly 3-point shooter or 2 to demand attention and dissuade opponents from doubling the stars, or a big man like Vucevic to pose a threat in the middle were glaring in their absence in the second half of this one. Credit the Blazers for making good adjustments and not quitting.
3. The Coach's Challenge
Someone PLEASE explain to me why Coach Donovan refuses to use a challenge this season. Caruso has asked for it several times this season near the end of games, and he's been right every time by my count... yet Donovan will not use the challenge. Does he have some moral issue with the existence of such a rule? I mean I guess he doesn't want to lose a timeout, but when it's a critical play that will change possessions or directly affect points near the end of a game, it's more valuable than an extra timeout. They had a timeout's worth of time to review the play that would have given the Bulls the ball near the end of the game, too. I don't get it.
Still love Billy Donovan though.
Comments
Post a Comment